Constant of proportionality of prime number density
This article uses technical mathematical notation for logarithms. All instances of log(x) without a subscript base should be interpreted as a natural logarithm, also commonly written as ln(x) or loge(x).
Examination of available numerical data for known values of led Legendre to an approximating formula.
Legendre proposed in 1808 the formula
(OEIS: A228211), as giving an approximation of with a "very satisfying precision".[1][2]
Today, one defines the real constant by
which is solved by putting
provided that this limit exists.
Not only is it now known that the limit exists, but also that its value is equal to 1, somewhat less than Legendre's 1.08366. Regardless of its exact value, the existence of the limit implies the prime number theorem.
Pafnuty Chebyshev proved in 1849[3] that if the limit B exists, it must be equal to 1. An easier proof was given by Pintz in 1980.[4]
It is an immediate consequence of the prime number theorem, under the precise form with an explicit estimate of the error term
(for some positive constant a, where O(…) is the big O notation), as proved in 1899 by Charles de La Vallée Poussin,[5] that B indeed is equal to 1. (The prime number theorem had been proved in 1896, independently by Jacques Hadamard[6] and La Vallée Poussin,[7] but without any estimate of the involved error term).
Being evaluated to such a simple number has made the term Legendre's constant mostly only of historical value, with it often (technically incorrectly) being used to refer to Legendre's first guess 1.08366... instead.
^Sur la distribution des zéros de la fonction et ses conséquences arithmétiques, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, Vol. 24, 1896, pp. 199–220 OnlineArchived 2012-07-17 at the Wayback Machine
^« Recherches analytiques sur la théorie des nombres premiers », Annales de la société scientifique de Bruxelles, vol. 20, 1896, pp. 183–256 et 281–361